Getting a Warning Removed from a Wikipedia Article
Step 1
Identify the Warning Template and Understand the Issues
- Before requesting removal, figure out:
- What does the template say? Examples include:
- {{Notability}} → Article may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.
- {{Advert}} → Article is written like an advertisement.
- {{POV}} → Article is not neutral.
- {{Cleanup}} → Article needs rewriting or formatting improvements.
- Why was the template added?
- Check the edit history (click “View history” at the top).
- See if an editor explained the reason in the Talk page (click “Talk” at the top).
Step 2
Improve the Article (If Possible)
- Since you have a COI, you should not directly edit the article but can propose improvements.
- Address the issue by writing a revised section or providing sources.
- Use high-quality, independent sources if the problem is about notability or neutrality.
- Avoid promotional language if flagged for being too much like an advertisement.
- 🔹 Example: If the article is flagged for a lack of sources
- ✅ Find reliable sources (news articles, academic papers, books).
- ✅ Suggest adding citations to support claims.
Step 3
Request Template Removal on the Talk Page
Since you cannot remove the template yourself due to a COI, you should ask independent editors to review the issue.
How to Post a Request on the Talk Page
Go to the Talk page (click “Talk” at the top of the article).
Post a request using this format. Note, the four squiggly lines at the end are your signature, which will auto-populate if you are logged in:
== Request to Remove Warning Template == {{Edit COI}} Hello editors, I have a conflict of interest regarding [Article Name], so I am not making direct edits. However, I would like to request a review of the [Warning Template Name] banner. The issue flagged was [e.g., lack of neutral tone, lack of sources]. I have identified [X number] of reliable sources and proposed wording changes to address the concern. - [Source 1] - [Brief description] - [Source 2] - [Brief description] Could an editor review my suggested changes and consider whether the template is still needed? Thank you! ~~~~
Be patient—volunteer editors will review the request.
Step 4
Engage with Editors Politely
- If an editor asks for more improvements, respond professionally and provide more sources or revisions.
- If an editor declines the request, ask for clarification and work on further improvements.
- If the template is removed, thank the editor for their time.
Step 5
Follow Up if Necessary
- If there’s no response after a week, you can politely follow up on the Talk page.
- If there’s a dispute, you can ask for a Third Opinion (WP:3O) or request help at Wikipedia’s Teahouse (for newcomers).
Common Issues and Solutions
❌ “My request was ignored.”
✅ Wait at least a week before following up. Try posting on the Teahouse for help.
❌ “An editor rejected my request.”
✅ Ask what specifically needs improvement and propose further edits.
❌ “Someone re-added the template after it was removed.”
✅ Review their reasoning and go back to the Talk page to discuss.
Final Takeaways
✅ DO NOT remove the template yourself if you have a COI.
✅ Use the Talk page to request removal with a clear and polite explanation.
✅ Improve the article first by proposing better sources or rewriting problematic sections.
✅ Be patient and engage respectfully with Wikipedia editors.